Title: THE LITTLE SHOP
OF HORRORS
Date: 6/15/1995; Publication: Magill's Survey of Cinema;
Magill's Survey of Cinema
06-15-1995
THE LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS
Abstract:
This black comedy centers on nerdish Seymour Krelboin (Jonathan Haze), who
works in a Skid Row flower shop and has designs on the boss's daughter, Audrey
(Jackie Joseph). One day
Summary:
To appreciate fully the work of Roger Corman, often referred to as "King
of the 'B's," it is first necessary to cast aside that misleading title,
which simplifies and somewhat obscures his accomplishments as a filmmaker.
Strictly speaking, Corman never made "B"-films. He began his career
in the early 1950's, at a time when the traditional "B"-film, the
staple of double bills and Saturday matinees, was nearing its demise. For more
than two decades, the low-budget feature film served a particular function for
its audiences and occupied a well-defined position within the economic
structure of the motion picture industry. "B"-films were the
"junk food" of
During the 1930's and 1940's, when motion pictures were still the preeminent
form of mass entertainment in America and Hollywood the principal supplier, the
production and distribution of the "B"-films was so carefully
tailored for the relatively stable market that their profitability, while
modest, was virtually assured. The major producers relied on their
"B"-programs as a solid backup for the somewhat riskier big-budget
ventures, while many other companies--known collectively as
The changes in the motion picture business during the 1950's--decreased
attendance, the breakdown of the previously set differentiation between
"A"-films and "B"-films, the breakup of the vertical
integration of the industry (that is, ownership of theaters by production
companies) by Federal court order in 1948--all added up to increased
competition for a diminished box-office dollar. In the mad scramble for public
favor, producers of big-budget films opted for technological extravagance--the
wide-screen, color, cast-of-thousands approach that was obviously beyond the
resources of all but the major studios. For their part, low-budget filmmakers
cannily directed their product toward one particular segment of American
society which was not interested in staying at home and watching
television--teenagers. The films that pointed the way toward the developing
"youth market" were major
It was in this atmosphere that Corman's career began. Following a few odd jobs
in the industry, he made his first script sale, a crime melodrama called
HIGHWAY DRAGNET, in 1953; combining the proceeds from that enterprise with his
other meager resources, he formed his own company and produced MONSTER FROM THE
OCEAN FLOOR (1954). This science-fiction "epic," in a clear presaging
of his later career, was shot in six days on a miniscule twelve-thousand-dollar
budget. His next production, another criminal-on-the-lam story entitled THE
FAST AND THE FURIOUS (1954), became the first film to be released by James H.
Nicholson and his partner Samuel Z. Arkoff; it provided the basis for their
formation of American International Pictures, the first notable corporate
success in the "new"
Corman began directing with FIVE GUNS WEST (1955). While some of his early
efforts were in the more traditional genres such as Westerns and gangster
films, by the end of the decade he had tried his hand at many others--science
fiction (IT CONQUERED THE WORLD, 1956, and WAR OF THE SATELLITES, 1957), rock
music dramas (ROCK ALL NIGHT, 1957), teen melodramas (TEENAGE DOLL, 1957, and
SORORITY GIRL, 1957), black comedy (A BUCKET OF BLOOD, 1959), and a few films
which defy generic classification (TEENAGE CAVEMAN, 1958, and VIKING WOMEN AND
THE SEA SERPENT, 1957). Many of the twenty-three films of Corman's first five
years as a director were crudely exploitative, but few are unwatchably bad, and
a handful are remarkably good--notably MACHINE GUN KELLY (1958), TEENAGE DOLL,
and A BUCKET OF BLOOD. Corman was obviously feeling his way, learning his craft
under the adverse circumstances imposed by severe budgetary limitations, and
the overall quality of his work is only a modest cut above that of other
low-budget directors of the period. His work during this period, however, does
show the development of a fluid, striking visual style--clear, dynamic, and occasionally
graceful--that would flower more fully in his post-1960 films. His early films,
particularly those in collaboration with cinematographer Floyd Crosby, display
an intelligent, inventive use of the black-and-white, wide-screen format--and a
consistent avoidance of the static, visually awkward quality of many
wide-screen
THE LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS is one of Corman's most remarkable films, not merely
because it was shot in the phenomenal time of only two days (and a night), but
because it manages, in spite of its extremely limited material resources, to be
funny, imaginative, and entertaining. It is black comedy of the purest sort and
lends itself as well to serious analysis of its social satire. The story
concerns simple-minded schlemiel Seymour Krelboin (Jonathan Haze, in a
performance clearly derivative of Jerry Lewis), who works in a Skid Row flower
shop as an assistant to greedy florist Gravas Mushnik (Mel Welles) and is in
love with Mushnik's daughter Audrey (Jackie Joseph).
That night, wandering the streets in despair,
Corman says that THE LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS "was the film that in the long
run has made me whatever legend I am." He recalls that it was made as a
kind of "joking challenge" when a studio manager offered him the use
of a store set. Working with writer Charles B. Griffith, a frequent
collaborator, he developed a rough outline, which
Both films have an undercurrent of biting social satire, but the particular
ethnic flavor of THE LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS lends it some additional weight.
Seymour Krelboin and the Mushniks are lower-middle-class Jews in a generalized
urban ghetto milieu;
THE LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS, in the circumstances and spirit of its production,
is the crowning achievement of Corman's early directorial career. It comes
significantly in the middle of an important transitional period. That same
year, he also produced and directed HOUSE OF USHER, the first in his series of
Edgar Allan Poe "adaptations," a few of which were reasonably
faithful to their sources, others being mere borrowings of titles. It is for
this group of films that Corman is most widely known as a director; during the
next several years, he directed THE PIT AND THE PENDULUM (1961), THE PREMATURE
BURIAL (1961), TALES OF TERROR (1961), THE RAVEN (1962), THE HAUNTED PALACE
(1963), TOMB OF LIGEIA (1964), and THE MASQUE OF THE RED DEATH (1964). Shot on
comparatively extravagant three-week schedules, in color, and with budgets that
could have financed a half-dozen of his earlier films (although still quite low
by general
It was also during this period that Corman made his only foray into
"serious" filmmaking with THE INTRUDER (1961), a drama of racial
tension in the American South, adapted by Charles Beaumont from his own novel.
Its impact enhanced by location shooting (on a typically low budget), THE
INTRUDER was a solid and compelling film, featuring a superb performance by
William Shatner as a rabble-rousing bigot. As socially conscious melodrama in the
Stanley Kramer vein, it is superior to many better-known essays on the same
theme, as well as being several years ahead of its time in its cinematic
treatment of school desegregation in the
In 1970, following several years of decreased activity as a director and bad
experiences with the distribution of his last few films, Corman abandoned the
director's chair to form his own production and distribution organization, New
World Pictures. Essentially, New World is a corporate extension of Corman, not
only in the continuation, from an executive position, of the same well-honed
principles of budgetary tightness and no-nonsense commercialism that
contributed significantly to the success of American International, but in his
more serious aspirations as well. In this sense,
In addition to Corman the director and Corman the producer/studio head, there
is a third Corman: the mentor. His nurturing of potentially important film
talent is another key element of his status in the film industry; he has long
been known for his willingness to give young, untested filmmakers an
opportunity to learn their craft as he once did, toiling under the pressures
imposed by tight schedules and small budgets. His motives for this policy are
perhaps more economic than altruistic, but the list of Corman
"alumni" is nevertheless impressive: Francis Ford Coppola, Martin
Scorsese, Peter Bogdanovich, Robert Towne, Jack Nicholson, Jonathan Demme,
Bruce Dern, and Peter Fonda, among others, all received valuable experience
working for Corman early in their careers--experience without which there may
never have been films such as THE GODFATHER (1972), THE LAST PICTURE SHOW
(1971), MEAN STREETS (1973), EASY RIDER (1969), and CHINATOWN (1974), all
important influential films. With all his activities taken into account, Corman
emerges as far more than "King of the 'B's"; he has obviously had a
major influence, directly and indirectly, on both the commercial and artistic
shape of the American cinema for more than two decades.
Corman as a director, however, is a figure of critical controversy.
Consideration of his films as cinematic art invariably leads directly into the
"art versus money" argument which pervades much film criticism.
Unable to come to grips with the concept of a true "commercial art
form," many critics do not look beyond the generally exploitative surfaces
of Corman's films. Indeed, their perception is easily clouded by the titles
alone: Can the creator of such lurid-sounding films as TEENAGE DOLL, THE WASP
WOMAN (1959), A BUCKET OF BLOOD, THE TRIP, THE MAN WITH THE X-RAY EYES (1963),
and dozens of others be taken seriously as an artist? The official tastemakers
tend to say no, although they may nod in Corman's direction out of sociological
interest--a fertile, although obvious, field for exploration of his prolific
output.
As a reaction to this narrow, elitist attitude, there have been attempts to
elevate Corman to the status of a full-fledged auteur, postulating (to quote
one example) that his body of work is "a series of comments and variations
on the theme of sacred time, largely expressed in terms of the Myth of the
Eternal Return." This position seems equally extremist, a manifestation of
the generally undisciplined nature of film criticism and of the often perverse
desire to elevate the obscure at the expense of the established. While the
first approach demonstrates a blindness to the complex
nature of film as an art form, the latter displays a riotous lack of
perspective on Corman's work. It is obvious from Corman's own statements that
he is primarily a businessman with a constant eye on a film's finances; as a
director (a position he seems in no hurry to resume after a decade in the
executive's chair), he regards himself as an entertainer, not an artist. It
should be remembered, however, that the American cinema's main purpose has
always been entertainment, and that some of the directors who are now
acknowledged to be among our greatest film artists--such as Howard Hawks and
Alfred Hitchcock--were equally modest about their achievements and were
overlooked or denigrated as "mere" entertainers by many critics.
At the very least, Corman's films exhibit a prodigious financial
resourcefulness that is in itself a form of virtuosity, a cinematic grace that
often belies the film's tawdry subject matter, a compelling dynamism that
easily eclipses the work of many better-known filmmakers, and a keen awareness
of the currents and rhythms of American life. Perhaps one day the influence and
quality of Corman's work will be fully appreciated by critics and
historians--as they always have been, anonymously, by film audiences.
Country of Origin:
Release Date: 1960
Production Line:
Roger Corman for
Director: Roger Corman
Cinematographer: Archie Dalzell
File Editor: Marshall Neilan, Jr.
Additional Credits:
Art direction - Daniel Haller
Run Time: 70 minutes
Cast:
Seymour Krelboin - Jonathan Haze
Audrey - Jackie Joseph
Gravas Mushnik - Mel Welles
Dental patient - Jack Nicholson
Winifred - Myrtle Vail
Mrs. Shiva - Leola Wendorff
Fouch - Dick Miller
Review Sources:
New York Times.
Newsweek.
Time.
Variety: May 10, 1961, p. 6.
Named persons in Production Credits:
Roger Corman
Studios named in Production Credits:
Santa Clara
Filmgroup
Screenplay (Author):
Charles B. Griffith
Black and White
Video Available.
Genre:
Comedy, Horror
Notes:
The film was shot in two days and one night.
Return to Main Articles Menu Page or Return to Home